![]() ![]() For example, I've heard a difference in iTunes at one times. The DAW shouldn't add or subtract from the audio, so I would look elsewhere. I've not heard anything "flat" like you mentioned. It reminded of what I used to "feel" from working in protools, though could never test because the interfaces wouldn't share with programs. What is going on? Is itunes using some sort of playback engine that makes things sound prettier? Or is Reaper playback engine behind the curve? The difference sounds like a generation loss. Reaper, it sounds flat, flat, and somewhat boring like I expect it to. Sounds same louldness, just clearer and wider. ITunes, the files sound gorgeous and glorius, wide and 3D. And man, there is a serious difference between the way itunes plays a aif or wav file, and the way Reaper plays the same file, through same output and speakers. I always tell myself its psychological/That its my imagination (ie ProTools *sounds* better than Reaper for example).īut now I can test Reaper against audio output from another program using same soundcard: 2015 Macbook Pro line out & built-in speakers. Second) The first problem leads to worries about the playback integrity. ie, if it stops playback I know it couldn't make it the whole way. Working OTB, it would be nice to walk away from a mix while its rendering stems and not worry about it. And no way to turn it off so I can know that my audio is being compromised. But I can't help but worry, is it happening at times in an inaudible way? There's no control over it, no meters to tell me how much if it is happening. I love Reaper, but I often wonder about the sound quality.įirst) Reaper has always approached the project maxing out with that "stuttering" playback thing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |